Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Bayonets in ParadiseMartial Law in Hawai'i during World War II$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Harry N. Scheiber and Jane L. Scheiber

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9780824852887

Published to Hawaii Scholarship Online: November 2016

DOI: 10.21313/hawaii/9780824852887.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM HAWAII SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.hawaii.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Hawaii University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in HSO for personal use.date: 26 July 2021

New Habeas Cases

New Habeas Cases

The Provost Courts on Trial

Chapter:
(p.274) Chapter Fourteen New Habeas Cases
Source:
Bayonets in Paradise
Author(s):

Harry N. Scheiber

Jane L. Scheiber

Publisher:
University of Hawai'i Press
DOI:10.21313/hawaii/9780824852887.003.0015

The next phase of the legal challenge was initiated by three prisoners who were not internees but had been convicted for ordinary crimes by the provost courts. The most celebrated of all the Hawai`i cases was that of a civil shipyard worker, Lloyd Duncan, convicted of assault on two military sentries. Judge Metzger presided in spring 1944 over an extended habeas hearing in which General Richardson and Admiral Nimitz reasserted the absolute need for the revised martial law regime as it then stood, including denial of the habeas privilege. Metzger ruled flatly against the Army’s authority to try civilians in provost courts for ordinary crimes. Meanwhile in the other federal district court, Judge J. Frank McLaughlin similarly granted habeas and released two prisoners, in one case on general grounds that the military’s full seizure of power was unconstitutional, and in the other on finding the prisoner had been blatantly denied even the rudiments of a fair trial. Again the Army appealed the district court rulings to the Ninth Circuit, and again the habeas decisions were overruled—thus setting the stage in November 1944 for a test in the U.S. Supreme Court.

Keywords:   Lloyd Duncan, habeas corpus, Robert Richardson, Chester Nimitz, Edward Ennis, Delbert Metzger, J. Frank McLaughlin, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, military necessity

Hawaii Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.