This chapter displaces moral principles and decision from moral reflection and relocates them at the intersection of nothingness and desire. The intention is not to displace the moral subject from moral philosophy. To do so would be to deny the fact that only human beings are possessed of a subjectivity capable of overriding the drive of instinctual desires. Rather, the intention is to define a perspective within which the subject is not viewed primarily as an agent of free will while maintaining its role as an instrument of the good. It is not that we need to stop talking about having a choice among conflicting desires. The point is that the stress on individual freedom to will one's actions and the primacy of place given to motive can be made subservient to a renunciation of the desire to exercise personal freedom of choice in the name of a deeper, unelected desire for convivial harmony.
Hawaii Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.